XLSM Malware with MacroSheets

Excel-based malware has been around for decades and has been in the limelight in recent years. During the second half of 2020, we saw adversaries using Excel 4.0 macros, an old technology, to deliver payloads to their victims. They were mainly using workbook streams via the XLSX file format. In these streams, adversaries were able to enter code straight into cells (that’s why they were called macro-formulas). Excel 4.0 also used API level functions like downloading a file, creation of files, invocation of other processes like PowerShell, cmd, etc.  

With the evolution of technology, AV vendors started to detect these malicious Excel documents effectively and so to have more obfuscation and evasion routines attackers began to shift to the XLSM file format. In the first half of 2021, we have seen a surge of XLSM malware delivering different family payloads (as shown in below infection chart). In XLSM adversaries make use of Macrosheets to enter their malicious code directly into the cell formulas. XLSM structure is the same as XLSX, but XLSM files support VBA macros which are more advanced technology of Excel 4.0 macros. Using these macrosheets, attackers were able to access powerful windows functionalities and since this technique is new and highly obfuscated it can evade many AV detections. 

Excel 4.0 and XLSM are both known to download other malware payloads like ZLoader, Trickbot, Qakbot, Ursnif, IcedID, etc. 

Field hits for XLSM macrosheet malware detection

The above figure shows the Number of samples weekly detected by the detected name “Downloader-FCEI” which specifically targets XLSM macrosheet based malware. 

Detailed Technical Analysis 

XLSM Structure 

XLSM files are spreadsheet files that support macros. A macro is a set of instructions that performs a record of steps repeatedly. XLSM files are based upon Open XLM formats that were introduced in Microsoft Office 2007. These file types are like XLSX but in addition, they support macros. 

Talking about the XLSM structure when we unzip the file, we see four basic contents of the file, these are shown below. 

Figure-1: Content inside XLSM file
  • _rels contains the starting package-level relationship. 
  • docProps contains the metadata of the excel file. 
  • xl folder contains the actual contents of the file. 
  • [Content_Types].xml has references to the XML files present within the above folders. 

We will focus more on the “xl” folder contents. This folder contains all the excel file main contents like all the worksheets, media files, styles.xml file, sharedStrings.xml file, workbook.xml file, etc. All these files and folders have data related to different aspects of the excel file. But for XLSM files we will focus on one unique folder called macrosheets. 

These XLSM files contain macrosheets as shown in figure-2 which are nothing but XML sheet files that can support macros. These sheets are not available in other Excel file formats. In the past few months, we have seen a huge surge in XLSM file-type malware in which attackers store malicious strings hidden within these macrosheets. We will see more details about such malware in this blog. 

Figure-2: Macrosheets folder inside xl folder

To explain further how attackers uses XLSM files we have taken a Qakbot sample with SHA 91a1ba70132139c99efd73ca21c4721927a213bcd529c87e908a9fdd71570f1e. 

Infection Chain

Figure-3: Infection chain for Qakbot Malware

The infection chain for both Excel 4.0 Qakbot and XLSM Qakbot is similar. They both downloads dll and execute it using rundll32.exe with DllResgisterServer as the export function. 

XLSM Threat Analysis 

On opening the XLSM file there is an image that prompts the user to enable the content. To look legitimate and clean malicious actors use a very official-looking template as shown below.

Figure-4 Image of Xlsm file face

On digging deeper, we see its internal workbook.xml file. 

Figure-5: workbook.xml content

Now as we can see in the workbook.xml file (Figure-5), there is a total of 6 sheets and their state is hidden. Also, two cells have a predefined name and one of them is Sheet2323!$A$1 defined as “_xlnm.Auto_Open” which is similar to Sub Auto_Open() as we generally see in macro files. It automatically runs the macros when the user clicks on Enable Content.  

As we saw in Figure-3 on opening the file, we only see the enable content image. Since the state of sheets was hidden, we can right-click on the main sheet tab and we will see unhide option there, then we can select each sheet to unhide it. On hiding the sheet and change the font color to red we saw some random strings as seen in figure 6. 

Figure-6: Sheet face of xlsm file

These hidden sheets contain malicious strings in an obfuscated manner. So, on analyzing more we observed that sheets inside the macrosheets folder contain these malicious strings. 

Figure-7: Content of macrosheet XML file

Now as we can in figure-7 different tags are used in this XML sheet file. All the malicious strings are present in two tags <f> and <v> tags inside <sheetdata> tags. Now let’s look more in detail about these tags. 

<v> (Cell Value) tags are used to store values inside the cell. <f> (Cell Formula) tags are used to store formulas inside the cell. Now in the above sheet <v> tags contain the cached formula value based on the last time formula was calculated. Formula cells contain formulas like “GOTO(Sheet2!H13)”, now as we can see here attackers can store different formulas while referencing cells from different sheets. These operations are done to produce more and more obfuscated sheets and evade AV signatures. 

When the user clicks on the enable content button the execution starts from the Auto_Open cell, after which each sheet formula will start to execute one by one. The final deobfuscated string is shown below. 

Figure-8: Final De-Obfuscated strings from the file

Here the URLDownloadToFIleA API is used to download the payload and the string “JJCCBB” is used to specify data types to call the API. There are multiple URI’s and from one of them, the DLL payload gets downloaded and saved as ..\lertio.cersw. This DLL payload is then executed using rundll32. All these malicious activities get carried out using various excel based formulas like REGISTER, EXEC, etc. 

Coverage and prevention guidance: 

McAfee’s Endpoint products detect this variant of malware as below: 

The main malicious document with SHA256 (91a1ba70132139c99efd73ca21c4721927a213bcd529c87e908a9fdd71570f1e) is detected as “Downloader-FCEI” with current DAT files. 

Additionally, with the help of McAfee’s Expert rule feature, customers can add a custom behavior rule, specific to this infection pattern. 

Rule { 

    Process { 

        Include OBJECT_NAME { -v “EXCEL.exe” } 

    } 

Target { 

        Match PROCESS { 

            Include OBJECT_NAME { -v “rundll32.exe” } 

                      Include PROCESS_CMD_LINE { -v “* ..\*.*,DllRegisterServer” }  

                            Include -access “CREATE” 

         } 

  } 

} 

McAfee advises all users to avoid opening any email attachments or clicking any links present in the mail without verifying the identity of the sender. Always disable the Macro execution for Office files. We advise everyone to read our blog on these types of malicious XLSM files and their obfuscation techniques to understand more about the threat. 

Different techniques & tactics are used by the malware to propagate, and we mapped these with the MITRE ATT&CK platform. 

  • T1064(Scripting): Use of Excel 4.0 macros and different excel formulas to download the malicious payload. 
  • Defense Evasion (T1218.011): Execution of Signed binary to abuse Rundll32.exe and proxy executes the malicious code is observed in this Qakbot variant.  
  • Defense Evasion (T1562.001): Office file tries to convince a victim to disable security features by using a clean-looking image. 
  • Command and Control(T1071): Use of Application Layer Protocol HTTP to connect to the web and then downloads the malicious payload. 

Conclusion 

XLSM malware has been seen delivering many malware families. Many major families like Trickbot, Gozi, IcedID, Qakbot are using these XLSM macrosheets in high quantity to deliver their payloads. These attacks are still evolving and keep on using various obfuscated strings to exploit various windows utilities like rundll32, regsvr32, PowerShell, etc. 

Due to security concerns, macros are disabled by default in Microsoft Office applications. We suggest it is only safe to enable them when the document received is from a trusted source and macros serve an expected purpose. 

The post XLSM Malware with MacroSheets appeared first on McAfee Blogs.

Premium Domain Names – transcom.uk
Transcom ISP – The UK’s Best Business ISP
DoubleCheck any website at doublecheck.uk

White House Executive Order – Improving Detection of Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities

This is the third in a series of blogs on the Cybersecurity EO, and I encourage you to read those you may have missed. (Part 1, Part 2).

Between the initial publication of the Executive Order (EO) for Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity on May 12 and late July, a flurry of activity by departments and agencies continues to occur on how best to understand and address potential security gaps. Once identified, these analyses will facilitate plans to fulfill the requirements and further augment agencies’ existing preventative measures to improve their cybersecurity posture. Due to numerous far-reaching cybersecurity breaches that have occurred throughout the past year, one of the primary areas of emphasis in the Executive Order is enhancing the Federal Government’s ability to be more proactive in detecting vulnerabilities and preventing cybersecurity incidents throughout an agency’s network. By introducing an Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solution into an enterprise environment, the Government will be able to empower agency SOC teams to engage in active cyber hunting, containment, remediation, and incident response activities more universally.

How Does McAfee’s MVISION EDR Improve an Agency’s Security Posture?

The potential loss and impact of a cyberattack is no longer constrained to a single silo within an agency’s network or a small subset of devices. It can quickly escalate and impact the mission of an agency in seconds. That is why the Executive Order states it is crucial a government-wide initiative is undertaken to begin to get ahead of malicious actors by developing a comprehensive security strategy to prevent attacks before they happen.

Many cyberthreats use multiple attack mechanisms, requiring a different approach to keep our enterprises secure from malicious actors. Endpoint protection platforms still play a critical role in defending agency assets, but they are only one component of a multilayered approach to a robust cybersecurity strategy. Fortunately, McAfee Enterprise’s endpoint protection platform offers a threat detection capability that allows incorporating a next-generation solution (EDR) to track down potential threats if they break through the first layer of countermeasures.

By incorporating endpoint detection and response (EDR), organizations have granular control and visibility into their endpoints to detect suspicious activity. As a cloud service, EDR can incorporate new features and services in much more agile fashion than other solutions. MVISION EDR can discover and block threats in the pre-execution stage, investigate threats through analytics, and help provide an incident response plan. Additionally, by leveraging AI and machine learning to automate the steps in an investigative process, more experienced threat hunters can focus on in-depth analysis of sophisticated attacks, and other members of the SOC team can discover key findings to triage potential threats much faster and with less experience. These new capabilities can learn an agency’s baseline behaviors and use this information, along with a variety of other threat intelligence sources, to interpret findings.

Is Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Enough?

As the attack surface continues to evolve, a far more holistic approach to detection is needed. Although EDR is crucial to surfacing anomalous threats and malicious behavior for workstations, servers, and cloud workloads, their area of influence is confined to the telemetry provided by the endpoint. Realizing EDR is network blind and SIEM is endpoint blind, we integrated McAfee Enterprise EDR and SIEM technologies to enrich investigations. Still, more telemetry sources are needed to reveal all potential threat vectors an enterprise may encounter. This is where Extended Detection and Response (XDR) comes in, supporting agencies in a journey beyond the endpoint and allowing them to close even more gaps. 

Why Should Agencies Be Focusing on an Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Strategy?

XDR isn’t a single product or solution but rather a journey, as it refers to compiling multiple security products and technologies that comprise a unified platform. An XDR approach will shift processes and likely merge and encourage tighter coordination between different functions like SOC analysts, hunters, incident responders and IT administrators.

SIEMs are largely data-driven, meaning they need data definitions, custom parsing rules and pre-built content packs to retrospectively provide context based on the data they have ingested. In contrast, XDR is hypothesis driven, harnessing the power of machine learning and artificial intelligence engines to analyze high-fidelity threat data from a multitude of sources across the environment to support specific lines of investigation mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

Technically speaking, an XDR is a converged platform leveraging a common taxonomy and unifying language. An effective XDR must bring together numerous heterogeneous signals and return a homogenous visual and analytical representation. XDR must clearly show the potential security correlations that the SOC should focus on. Such a solution would de-duplicate information on one hand, but would emphasize the truly high-risk attacks, while filtering out the mountains of noise. The desired outcome would not require excessive amounts of repetitive manual work. Instead, it would allow SOC teams to focus on leading investigations and mitigating attacks. XDR’s presentation of data would be aware of context and content, be advanced technologically, yet be simple enough for analysts to understand and act upon.

As many organizations begin to adopt EDR solutions with the capability to embrace XDR, they also must consider how these solutions enable them to migrate toward a Zero Trust architecture. The wealth of information that will be available in a platform capable of distilling threat telemetry not only from endpoints, the networks they are accessing, and the cloud services they consume will create real advantages. It will greatly improve the granularity, flexibility, and accuracy of the policy engines granting access to enterprise resources and using that degree of trust to determine how much access is granted within the application.

The ideal solution must provide enhanced detection and response capabilities across endpoints, networks, and cloud infrastructures. It needs to prioritize and predict threats that matter before the attack and prescribe necessary countermeasures allowing the organization to proactively harden their environment. The ideal solution also must incorporate Zero Trust, and it should be built on an open security ecosystem.

McAfee Enterprise recognized early on that a multi-vendor security ecosystem is a key requirement to building a defense in depth security practice. One of the key building blocks was the Data Exchange Layer (DXL), which was subsequently made available as an open-source project (OpenDXL) for the community to further develop innovative use cases. This enabled our diverse ecosystem of partners from threat intelligence platforms to orchestration tools to use a common transport mechanism and information exchange protocol, thereby encouraging participating vendors to not only communicate vital threat details but also inform them of actions that all connected security solutions should take.

When you combine XDR and an open security ecosystem for XDR capabilities, agencies will have a solid foundation to advance their visibility and detection capabilities across their entire cyber infrastructure.

The post White House Executive Order – Improving Detection of Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities appeared first on McAfee Blogs.

Premium Domain Names – transcom.uk
Transcom ISP – The UK’s Best Business ISP
DoubleCheck any website at doublecheck.uk

#BHUSA: CISA Director Advocates for New Partnership to Improve Cybersecurity

#BHUSA: CISA Director Advocates for New Partnership to Improve Cybersecurity

Jen Easterly has only been on the job as the director of the United States’ Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA) for a few weeks, but she’s looking to make a quick impact.

In a keynote at the Black Hat US 2021 hybrid event on August 5, Easterly outlined the goals of CISA and announced a series of new initiatives designed to help enable closer coordination and partnership between the US government and the private sector. The big news was the announcement of the Joint Cyber Defense Collaborative (JCDC) with an initial group of partners that includes CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks, FireEye, Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services, AT&T, Verizon, and Lumen.

Easterly explained that the JCDC has two initial focus areas, with an effort to combat ransomware and an effort to develop a planning framework to respond to cyber-incidents on cloud providers. The need to bring government and the private sector together is highlighted by the scale of the problem.

“There’s a cyber-attack roughly every 40 seconds, and as we all know, ransomware has become a scourge affecting all Americans across society, with attacks against schools, hospitals, municipalities, pipelines, meat packing and all manner of software,” Easterly said. “We cannot allow avoidable cyber-disruptions to cost human lives.”

CISA’s Mission is Clear

CISA’s mission statement is pretty simple, according to Easterly.

“We lead the national effort to understand, manage and mitigate risk to our cyber and physical infrastructure,” she said. “It’s easy to say, but very hard to operationalize the significant consequences for failure.”

The vision for CISA is to enable secure and resilient infrastructure for the American people. She emphasized that the only way CISA can achieve its mission is in partnership with others.

“We can’t do this alone, because over 80% of critical infrastructure is in private hands, so it has to be an effort where we come together and collectively leverage our imagination, and collaboration, to help secure our cyber ecosystem,” Easterly said.

Why Partner with CISA

Perhaps the primary reason why Easterly was at Black Hat was to encourage those in the security industry and private industry to partner with CISA.

So why should any organization choose to work with CISA? Easterly said the first good reason is context.

“We can provide context to what you’re seeing on your network,” Easterly said. “Given where we are placed, our relationships with the intelligence community, the law enforcement community, industry and the federal government, we capture a holistic view of the threat landscape that we can provide to you to enable your understanding.”

Easterly also emphasized that by sharing information and partnering with CISA, early warnings about potential threats can be rapidly disseminated. Additionally, via partnership and efforts like the JCDC, she said, groups can come together to share cyber best practices to defend against the most significant cyber-threats to the nation. For Easterly, it’s not about the commonly heard concept of enabling a public–private partnership either.

“My goal is to really help breathe new life into these arguably hackneyed terms and turn the public–private partnership into public–private operational collaboration and information sharing, that is timely and relevant and most importantly, actionable,” she said.

Premium Domain Names – transcom.uk
Transcom ISP – The UK’s Best Business ISP
DoubleCheck any website at doublecheck.uk

#BHUSA: Windows Hello Passwordless Bypass Revealed

#BHUSA: Windows Hello Passwordless Bypass Revealed

Passwords are often a weak point in security, which is why approaches like Microsoft Hello that provide a passwordless approach to authentication are becoming increasingly popular.

While the promise of Windows Hello is to enable a more secure experience than regular passwords, it’s an approach that could have potentially been bypassed. Speaking at the Black Hat US 2021 hybrid event on August 5, Omer Tsarfati, security researcher at CyberArk, outlined a detailed attack chain by which he was able to bypass Windows Hello.

Tsarfati explained that the challenges of regular passwords are well known. They can often be weak and easily guessable, can fall victim to phishing attacks, and many users will reuse the same password on multiple sites. The basic idea behind passwordless is that there is the use of some alternate form of authentication technology to log on to a system without the need for a password.

Passwordless approaches can make use of biometrics, such as fingerprint scanning or facial recognition. Windows Hello made its debut in Windows 10 and provides Microsoft’s implementation of a passwordless model. With Windows Hello, users can make use of facial recognition to get access to a system, among other methods.

Any Image Will Work for Windows Hello

Tsarfati decided that in order to explore how to bypass Windows Hello’s facial recognition, he was going to need a standalone camera.

To that end, he got an NXP evaluation board, which can provide camera functionality to a Windows system via a USB plug. The goal for Tsarfati was to have the USB device mimic what a real Windows system camera would provide to Windows Hello, in order to learn what the system is actually processing as its makes a decision to enable access.

During his research, Tsarfati discovered that Windows Hello requires cameras to have an infrared (IR) sensor. The camera needs to be able to transmit both a color picture as well as IR frames in order for Windows Hello to make an authentication decision.

“Windows Hello doesn’t really pay attention to anything that you’re sending in the color frames,” Tsarfati said. “It’s only relying on the infrared, I sent frames of SpongeBob and it worked.”

SpongeBob SquarePants is a popular American cartoon character. As it turns out, Windows Hello just requires one color image, and it doesn’t matter what that image is.

In order to bypass Windows Hello, an attacker would just need a custom USB device that impersonates a camera. That USB device would then need to be able to transmit an IR image, which could potentially be captured from a victim. Tsarfati did not provide much detail on how a potential attacker would go about actually collecting an IR image from a victim, though he did demonstrate with his own IR image how the Windows Hello bypass does in fact work.

Tsarfati and CyberArk responsibly disclosed the issue to Microsoft in March of this year, and the flaw was formally identified as CVE-2021-34466, which Microsoft patched in July.

Premium Domain Names – transcom.uk
Transcom ISP – The UK’s Best Business ISP
DoubleCheck any website at doublecheck.uk

#BHUSA: Researchers Reveal DBREACH as New Attack Against Databases

#BHUSA: Researchers Reveal DBREACH as New Attack Against Databases

Databases are among the most critical applications for any organization, making them potentially lucrative targets for attackers.

At the Black Hat US 2021 hybrid event on August 5, a team of researchers detailed a new type of attack against databases that could potentially lead to information disclosure and loss. The attack goes by the name DBREACH, which is an acronym for Database Reconnaissance and Exfiltration via Adaptive Compression Heuristics.

Mathew Hogan explained that in modern databases, compression is often paired with encryption in order to reduce storage costs. However, that can potentially be risky as it could lead to exploitation by a class of vulnerabilities known as side-channel attacks.

“With DBREACH, an attacker is able to recover other users’ encrypted content by utilizing a compression side channel,” Hogan said. “We believe this is the first compression side-channel attack on a real-world database system.”

Over the course of an exhaustive 121-slide presentation, Hogan and his colleagues provided excruciating detail on how a DBREACH attack can work. At its core, DBREACH makes use of some of the same techniques as the CRIME (Compression Ratio Info-leak Made Easy) attack on Transport Layer Security (TLS) that was first disclosed in 2013.

As part of the research, the researchers looked specifically at the MariaDB open source database running with the InnoDB storage engine. Hogan noted that while that was the research team’s initial target, the same techniques will likely work on other databases that employ compression and encryption side by side.

According to Hogan, in order for DBREACH to work, an attacker needs the ability to insert and update into a database table, as well as be able to assess the size of a compressed table.

“We believe that this threat model is realistic and achievable,” Hogan said. “The update capability can be achieved through a front-end web interface that’s backed up by a database table, which is something that’s really common in a lot of databases.”

Mitigating DBREACH Risk

There are a number of different ways that database users can mitigate the risk for DBREACH.

For one, Hogan suggests that database administrators not use column-level permissions. Additionally, he recommended that organizations monitor database usage patterns for unusual activity. That unusual activity would be similar to Denial of Service (DoS) detection, looking for a single user that is performing an unusually high number of updates.

“The only foolproof method for preventing this attack is to turn off compression,” Hogan said.

Hogan added that there is likely to be a performance hit for turning off compression and storage will become more expensive. However, he noted that if the data is very sensitive it might be worth it.

“We believe that this really drives home the point that compression and encryption should be combined very carefully, lest you or your system fall victim to compression side-channel attack,” Hogan said.

Premium Domain Names – transcom.uk
Transcom ISP – The UK’s Best Business ISP
DoubleCheck any website at doublecheck.uk

#BHUSA: DHS Chief: ‘We are Competing for the Future of Cyberspace’

#BHUSA: DHS Chief: ‘We are Competing for the Future of Cyberspace’

Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), sees the future of cyberspace as being a contest of ideals, between openness and authoritarianism.

Mayorkas delivered his remarks in a keynote at the Black Hat US 2021 hybrid event on August 5. He noted that in recent years the cybersecurity landscape has shifted, with news headlines about data breaches; ransomware attacks disrupting hospitals, schools, food suppliers and pipelines; as well as interference in elections. The events of the last few years, according to Mayorkas, have served to reinforce the importance of cybersecurity, how it is governed and why there is a need for a free and secure cyberspace.

“Although we’re no longer fighting for control of land, we are competing for territory that we cannot see,” Mayorkas said. “We are competing for the future of cyberspace.”

The Competing Visions for the Internet

In Mayorkas’ view, in the world today there are two competing visions for the future of the internet.

One vision comes from countries like Russia, China and Iran that want to limit access and maximize control. The other vision comes the United States and its allies, who want to build and protect a free, open and secure internet.

“We must ultimately confront some critical questions like who will build, control and operate the underlying infrastructure of the internet, extending from undersea cables to data centers,” Mayorkas said. “How will we protect both privacy and security, online and offline, and how can we better protect ourselves against continuously growing and quickly evolving cyber-threats.”

The Role of DHS

In the battle for the future of the internet, Mayorkas emphasized that his agency plays a critical role.

“Every day, the Department of Homeland Security tackles these issues, which are not limited to the great game that exists between democratic and authoritarian governments, as they also include the relationship between government and private- sector entities,” Mayorkas said.

Mayorkas explained that the US Secret Service, which is part of DHS, is not only responsible for protecting the president, but is also actively fighting ransomware along with a range of other cyber-enabled crimes. The Transport Safety Authority (TSA) is best known for protecting airport security, and it also maintains regulatory authority over pipelines. That control was essential, following the Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack, enabling the government to take urgent and critical measures. Additionally, he noted that the US Coast Guard, which saves thousands of lives at sea every year, also protects the maritime transportation system against cyber-threats.

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), which is now led by Jen Easterly, who delivered the morning keynote at Black Hat, is also part of DHS.

“DHS is a fundamentally a department of partnerships,” Mayorkas said. “We’re really hard at work, and we have no illusions about the road ahead. There’s nothing simple about the cybersecurity challenges we face, and we need your help to get this right.”

Mayorkas, much like Easterly, made a pitch for the Black Hat audience to join the government either directly or via partnership to help improve the current status.

“We need you to help us navigate a path that has not yet been mapped,” Mayorkas stated emphatically. “What’s at stake here is nothing less than the future of the internet, the future of our economy and national security, and the future of our country.”

Premium Domain Names – transcom.uk
Transcom ISP – The UK’s Best Business ISP
DoubleCheck any website at doublecheck.uk

Aussie Rapper Shares Cyber-Stalking Ordeal

Aussie Rapper Shares Cyber-Stalking Ordeal

A rap artist from Australia has publicly urged his cyber-stalker to “do something constructive with your life.”

Alasdair Murray, who performs under the moniker Illy, was subjected to “malicious abuse” every day for a period of nearly two years by the unnamed cyber-stalker. 

Melbourne native Murray said the relentless perpetrator created more than 50 different accounts on social media and used them to harass the rapper, his family, his current and former romantic partners, and his friends. The cyber-stalker even targeted 34-year-old Illy’s record label. 

Illy said that the cyber-stalker would publish lies about the artist online, then use their many social media accounts to make it appear as though multiple people were interacting and giving credence to what had been written.

The hip-hop star’s ordeal was revealed in a social media post uploaded by Illy on August 4. In it, he describes the abuse he received as “constant” and “way beyond standard trolling.”

Illy stated that his abuser didn’t limit their actions to the virtual world, but also made false noise complaints about him to the police.

Receiving malicious direct messages and being subjected to various different forms of abuse on a daily basis for almost two years took its toll on the rapper.

“Having spent a big chunk of my life somewhat in the public eye, I’m usually pretty thick skinned, and accept that copping abuse comes with the territory. But for nearly 2 years I’ve copped constant, sustained, malicious abuse from an individual, way beyond standard trolling,” wrote Illy.

He added: “Not responding, especially when it was hurting those closest to me, has been difficult. It started affecting my day to day mentality, and that of those around me. 

“Dealing with the damage to self-worth, purpose, and career Covid caused, combined with seeing myself and ppl [sic] I care about subjected to this poison, has been a lot.”

Illy said that he will not be pressing charges against his cyber-stalker, who was identified and subsequently visited by authorities. 

The rapper said he chose to speak out about the experience “so anyone dealing with similar sh*t knows they don’t have to.”

Premium Domain Names – transcom.uk
Transcom ISP – The UK’s Best Business ISP
DoubleCheck any website at doublecheck.uk

US Teams Up with Companies to Defend Critical Infrastructure

US Teams Up with Companies to Defend Critical Infrastructure

The United States government is teaming up with leaders in technology, cybersecurity and communications to protect the nation’s critical infrastructure from cyber-attacks. 

Under a new Department of Homeland Security (DHS) initiative named the Joint Cyber Defense Collaborative (JCDC), key players in the tech field will weigh in to defend against cyber-threats such as ransomware. 

News of the JCDC was first reported earlier today by The Wall Street Journal. The publication said that the collaboration was launched to “improve defense planning and information sharing.”

Companies known to have flocked to the Department’s banner include tech leviathans Amazon, Google, and Microsoft, and cyber-warriors CrowdStrike, FireEye, and Palo Alto Networks.

Communications companies AT&T, Lumen Technologies, and Verizon have also answered the Department’s figurative call to arms. 

Director of the DHS’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, Jen Easterly, said getting everyone around the table now would make the US better prepared to handle future cyber-offensives.

She said that the creation of the JCDC “will uniquely bring people together in peacetime, so that we can plan for how we’re going to respond in wartime.”

The formation of the initiative follows in the digital footsteps of several widely reported cyber-attacks on critical infrastructure in the US in recent months, most notably the ransomware strikes impacting Colonial Pipeline and JBS.

Attacks on critical infrastructure in the US are nothing new, however, with perhaps the earliest incident being the hacking of Marconi’s wireless telegraph presentation with Morse code in 1903.

Describing what lessons can be learned from the JBS and Colonial Pipeline incidents, Eric Haseltine, chairman of the board at US Technology Leadership Council, said: “The number one lesson is that there is no such thing as 100% security.” 

He added: “That’s a really important insight from what happened because it should completely change the philosophical point of view on cybersecurity from trying to keep everything out, to assuming that you have been penetrated and proceeding accordingly.”

Michael Brown, rear admiral, USN (Retired), and founder and president of Spinnaker Security, said one way to defend critical infrastructure was to make it an unappealing target to attackers.

He said: “Make it costly; make it more expensive either in time or resources for the bad guys to attack you.”

Premium Domain Names – transcom.uk
Transcom ISP – The UK’s Best Business ISP
DoubleCheck any website at doublecheck.uk

#BHUSA: Looking for Vulnerabilities in Hospital Pneumatic Tubes

#BHUSA: Looking for Vulnerabilities in Hospital Pneumatic Tubes

In a session at the Black Hat US 2021 hybrid event, researchers from security firm Armis outlined a series of vulnerabilities dubbed PwndPiper that impact pneumatic tube delivery systems used by hospitals around the world.

Pneumatic Tubes (PT) is a technology invented over 200 years ago, according to Ben Seri, VP of research at Armis, and use air pressure to transfer different things. While the technology is old, it has been brought forward to the modern era and is commonly used in hospital settings to deliver specimens and even medicines to different locations within a hospital campus.

Among the vendors that develop pneumatic tube systems for hospitals is Swisslog, which has advanced the technology to connect to the internet and modern networks, and that’s where the trouble starts. Seri said that his company’s research team was able to discover no less than nine different vulnerabilities in Swisslog’s TransLogic Pneumatic Tube System. He noted that the TransLogic system is installed in over 2,300 hospitals in North America and over 3,000 worldwide.

Among the different types of vulnerabilities that Armis discovered were hardcoded passwords, privilege escalation flaws, stack overflows, and a non-secure firmware upgrade mechanism. Adding further insult to injury, Seri noted that all the vulnerabilities could have been triggered via unauthenticated network packets, without any user interaction. While the pneumatic tube network itself is an analog technology, Seri noted that the Swisslog system brings in digital management over internet protocol with a central server. That central server is a Windows device that is often connected to the public internet.

The potential risk of the flaws that the Armis team discovered could be quite dire. An attacker might have been able to take over a pneumatic tube system station and then launch a denial of service attack that would cripple the operations of the hospital. A successful attack could also potentially lead to the leak of personally identifiable information. Seri noted that there even could be the risk of the vulnerabilities’ leading to a ransomware attack.

Will it Run Doom?

As part of the session, Seri and his colleague Barak Hadad, researcher at Armis, showed a demonstration of how the vulnerabilities could be exploited.

“Will it run Doom?” Seri asked. “The short answer is it will.”

Doom is a first-person shooter game, and it’s not something that should have been able to be installed on the Swisslog system, and yet the Armis researchers were able to do so.

“It’s very important to develop robust security mitigations, to safeguard these types of systems,” Seri said.

Seri noted that Armis reported all the vulnerabilities to Swisslog and patches are now available that hospitals should implement.

Premium Domain Names – transcom.uk
Transcom ISP – The UK’s Best Business ISP
DoubleCheck any website at doublecheck.uk

#BHUSA: The Serious Disinformation Threat Posed by GPT-3

#BHUSA: The Serious Disinformation Threat Posed by GPT-3

The development of generative Pre-trained Transformer 3 (GPT-3) offers worrying opportunities for bad actors to launch mis and disinformation campaigns online, according to research conducted on the AI technology by the Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET).

Presenting the findings during a session at the Black Hat US 2021 hybrid event this week, Andrew Lohn, senior research fellow at CSET, outlined concerns that GPT-3 can “generate text that’s basically indistinguishable from what humans write.” He added that it is concerning “what this language model could do in the wrong hands.”

Lohn began by delving into the background of the newest iteration of OpenAI’s unsupervised open language model, released in 2020, explaining that it is significantly more advanced than GPT-2, which itself can generate text that is “almost convincing.”

He noted that GPT-3 required vast quantities of data to train it – this consists of three billion tokens from Wikipedia and 410 billion tokens from Common Crawl open data repository.

Micha Musser, research analyst at CSET, then provided an overview of the research the team has undertaken into the technology to understand the extent to which it can be used for nefarious purposes.

For their experiments, the researchers used a demo tool called ‘Twodder,’ “which is in effect a GPT-3 only social media site that we have built.” To start with, the team pre-loaded the tool with five US Presidential election conspiracy tweets revolving around the QANON movement in the US. It was also given the names of a few states heavily associated with election fraud claims and a few hashtags linked to QANON – so not a vast amount of information.

Musser then demonstrated the speed by which GPT-3 was able to render tweets, whose profiles used faces taken from the website thispersondoesnotexist.com.

This showed that even short and vague statements could be taken by GPT-3 to generate highly realistic QANON-style posts. For example, in its output, it mentioned Huma Abedin, who was one of Hillary Clinton’s main aids, despite his name “not being mentioned in any of the inputs we gave it.”

“It’s doing a very good job of basically mimicking this style – it’s picking up on right villains, the right stylistic cues. All of this is very advanced,” said Musser. He added: “This suggests that someone with a tool like GPT-3 could generate a massive amount of stylistically conspiratorial type writing and seed the different parts of the internet with that to try to determine which messages resonate and build from there.”

“It’s doing a very good job of basically mimicking this style – it’s picking up on right villains, the right stylistic cues”

In another experiment, CSET wanted to see whether GPT-3 was capable of analyzing a breaking news story from a mainstream publication and “rewrite it in a way that privileges a pre-chosen narrative.” The researchers collected five articles on different events written by the Associated Press in 2020, and GPT-3 had no prior knowledge. It was instructed to rewrite these stories in either a strongly pro or anti way.

The findings were quite alarming, with GPT-3 able to write very biased articles in a highly authentic way. Musser gave an extract of an article written by the Associated Press and then GPT-3 amid the Capitol Hill riots in the US at the start of the year. The Associated Press article extract reads as follows:

Trump doesn’t ask backers to disperse after storming capitol

The seat of democracy descended into chaos when protestors overwhelmed police and bullied their way into the Capitol, forcing a delay in the joint session of Congress where lawmakers were counting electoral votes that will affirm Democrat Joe Biden’s White House victory two weeks before Inauguration Day…”

GPT-3 produced the following rewrite:

President Trump is Rightfully Disappointed

“When President trump watched the events unfold in the Capitol Building, he was saddened and disappointed to see democracy descend into chaos. He wants his supports to be peaceful and respectful when protesting, but he understands that passions run deep and people can get carried away…”

While overall, GPT-3-generated articles scored lower for authenticity compared to the real ones, if set up correctly, “this tool could be used on social media or to seed fake news stories.”

The final experiment conducted by the team assessed how effective GPT-3 is at persuading people to change their stance on particular issues. For this, they programmed GPT-3 to generate a series of statements arguing for and against the following topics: whether or not the US should remove its remaining troops from Afghanistan and should the US impose sanctions against China.

The team conducted a survey involving around 1700 participants to see how these GPT-3-generated arguments influenced people’s views. The results demonstrated very clearly that “these statements actually impacted respondents’ beliefs.”

Musser said this was concerning as “GPT-3 might not need to be particularly good if threat actors can use it to create a mass of arguments in favor of a position they want to advance, even if those arguments aren’t particularly good, they might be able to get something like this effect.”

In the final part of the session, Lohn outlined the practical difficulties of using GPT-3 to spread disinformation at scale. As it stands, no GPU is big enough to handle GPT-3, and it has to be split up to run over many GPUs. However, there are likely to be solutions in place for this problem in the near future; for example, telco provider Huawei has stated that they will open-source the model-splitting tools.

Lohn added that the financial costs of running widespread misinformation campaigns via GPT-3 are currently prohibitive to individual hackers, although it “is not a big deal for powerful nation-states.”

Another problem for malicious actors is the sheer number of social media accounts they need to create to distribute messages on a wide enough scale to cut through. Lohn believes it is this infrastructure issue that should be focused on to identify GPT-3-generated social media posts, as “there is very little hope of detecting those messages based on the text itself, they’re pretty well indistinguishable from people.”

Premium Domain Names – transcom.uk
Transcom ISP – The UK’s Best Business ISP
DoubleCheck any website at doublecheck.uk